Skip to main content

The 5 Levels of Work

And why you shouldn't be afraid to be wrong

Opportunity → Lead Scoring Tool

Framework → The 5 Levels Of Work

Tool → Cranston AI

Trend → AI Articles

Quote → Don’t Be Afraid To Be Wrong

🔗 Houck’s Picks

My favorite finds of the week.

Fundraising

  • This AI agent is helping 100 founders fill their rounds before EOY (Link)

  • Austin Walker on how to pitch your startup (Link)

  • Brian Ortiz on the startup founder fundraising operating system (Link)

Growth

  • Noel Ceta’s content experimentation framework (Link)

  • Andrew Chen’s braindump on viral loops (Link)

  • Kai Lode on the best marketing advice he ever got (Link)

ICYMI

  • Unlock global growth with Justworks EOR (Link)*

  • Rohit Mittal on 1st time founder vs. second time founder (Link)

  • Conor Brennan-Burke on founding a startup in your 30s (Link)

  • David Booth on the social capital balance sheet (Link)

  • Danny Postma on what you should do when you hit PMF and go viral (Link)

 Opportunity: Lead Scoring Tool

With more data at our fingertips than ever, and LLMs to process it, the way we score leads likely needs an update.

Sales teams get huge lead lists, but scoring them just based on their job title, location, etc. seems overly simplistic.

At this point, most high-powered sales teams have unique datapoints and heuristics they consider when mentally scoring leads, but some of this happens during their research on the lead rather than actually being brought into the score their CRM is showing them.

Why not have an LLM ingest all of that additional contextual data and incorporate it into a more intelligent score, so sales teams can save time and get in front of more leads (rather than researching them)?

Spotted on Ideabrowser

🧠 Framework: The 5 Levels Of Work

Founders spend money on employee salaries to solve more problems.

Some of those solutions are meant to be growth-oriented and revenue generating, others are meant to improve the product, retain customers, or even solve interpersonal team dynamics that aren’t working.

But the key part of that is solving problems in the first place.

There’s a great post from Andrej Karpathy on why agency is more important than intelligence, and I recommend founders apply that type of thinking to their hires.

A good way to measure for it is this framework:

Which type of employees are you hiring? What level of problem-solver are they?

With that said, don’t let this mindset of the best employees being fully autonomous blind you.

It’s easy to see this and think that it means you don’t need to be in the details yourself on problems.

Wrong. That’s a path to getting surprised when big problems pop up out of nowhere, that people tried to solve themselves and failed.

Just because you hire high agency people doesn’t excuse you from being aware of what’s going on with your business.

🛠 Tool: Cranston AI

There are a number of interesting and useful AI-powered accounting software platforms out there for startups, my favorites are Kick (which I use) and Puzzle (which I also quite like and is more geared towards venture-backed companies).

Cranston is a new offering that looks more agentic than like a traditional platform.

The idea has potential, it’s the type of tool that could take something previously done by a high-salaried accountant and allow an ops person or even a VA to manage (if you trust their accuracy with it). Worth a look!

📈 Trend: AI Articles

It’s happening.

More than 50% of the articles being published online seem to be created by AI now.

Things have flipped, and we’re never going back.

Here’s what’s going to happen next:

First, the majority of content published each day is created by AI.

Next, overall the majority of content on the internet (published ever) will have been created by AI (cue the dead internet theory vibes).

As this is happening, LLMs will be scraping, ingesting, and learning from this AI content, creating a loop.

What happens after that is unclear. You’re effectively training AI slop generators on… AI slop. As Trent Reznor would say, it’s a copy of a copy of a copy of a copy of a…

At a minimum, it will create the need for human-verified spaces online. It will probably be one of the next major use cases for blockchain (Worldcoin is ahead on this, even if the eye-scanning feels odd).

At that point, questions emerge:

  1. If humans do end up prefering human-verified spaces, what is the purpose of non-human-verified spaces online?

  2. What happens to the accuracy of LLMs as they begin to be trained, increasingly, on their own outputs (presumably including hallucinations)?

Gonna be a wild few years with this one.

💬 Quote: Don’t Be Afraid To Be Wrong

How many times are you wrong every week? Or every day?

Founders should track their wrong decisions.

Being sure that you’re wrong happens sooner than being sure you’re right, so you can learn more (and faster) by tracking them.

Don’t shy away from admitting you’re wrong. Embrace and actually learn from it.

Get the next one.

One essay every Sunday on the decisions that make or break founders.